Understanding the difference between primary and secondary sources is on every art teacher qualification curriculum. It’s interesting to consider the benefits of each. Both have a place. It’s important to teach our students the difference and, for me, it usually gets wrapped up into conversations about integrity.
What has more integrity: finding a picture of an object on the internet by some unknown person and drawing it, or drawing it from first-hand observation or from your own photograph?
We can consider what a primary and secondary source is, their benefits, how they fit into the curriculum and how artists have worked from primary and secondary sources.
A primary source is created through direct, first-hand observation.
In art, this usually means:
Key rule:
Drawing from life = primary source
Many artists are known for working directly from observation:
Drawing from a primary source is definitely more difficult than drawing from a flat photograph. A flat image is more easily transcribed onto a flat page. However, drawing from a primary source:
A secondary source is material created by someone else or created for reference.
In art, this includes:
Key rule:
Drawing from a photograph = secondary source. A photograph is once removed from the original object.
NB: If a student has taken a photograph, and the photograph is the final artwork, it can be considered a primary source. If the photograph is used as a reference to make another artwork, such as a drawing or painting, it is a secondary source. Really? Hmmm…yes, this is certainly a grey area and the lines will no doubt get blurred!
Many contemporary artists work primarily from photographs and found imagery:

A balanced curriculum usually combines projects that incorporate both primary and secondary sources.
A photograph taken by the student is better than one found online, as it supports personal investigation. However, there are many situations where first-hand observation is not possible, and using secondary sources is entirely appropriate and expected.
A student who is following an independent course of study may come up with a wonderfully creative idea, such as creating work inspired by a recent political demonstration in another country, or want to create work inspired by snow leopards and endangered animals that will heavily rely on secondary sources, and that is absolutely fine. If it’s good enough for Andy Warhol, Gerhard Richter and Banksy, it’s good enough for our students.
The key is that secondary sources should support ideas, not replace observation or be copied directly without development.
Helping students understand this distinction early in their school art career will help them make informed choices as they move towards making personal and independent work.
My resources are designed to save your hours of planning time. You can purchase them individually or through my great value subscription.
If you have enjoyed this article about Primary and Secondary Sources in Art, why not register to receive my newsletter and hear about future articles? You’ll be able to download 3 of my free art lessons every month, too.
